Biopharming, Bananas and Bureaucracy: The Banana Vaccine as a Case Study for Products that Straddle the Definitional Food/Drug Divide

May 2011

This paper examines the definition of the terms "food" and "drug" as used in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act through the lens of biopharmed products. The paper uses the so-called "banana vaccine" as a case study to highlight the problems that occur when attempting to regulate a product that could be safely used as a food or as a drug. Specifically, the examination of this model illustrates the problems in the current definitional scheme. The paper considers how a product that straddles the definitional line between food and drug could be regulated and proposes a reformation to how the definitions are applied to products to better suit new technology in food and drugs.


For more than 60 years, this award-winning journal has offered readers scholarly, in-depth, analytical articles, providing insight into the actions of FDA, FTC, and USDA, how the courts interpret these actions, and the reaction of industry. Articles published in the Food and Drug Law Journal are heavily cited and reviewed by your peers. The Food and Drug Law Journal is published four times per year.

Single Article Pricing
For a full text version of a particular article, or a copy of an entire issue, contact FDLI's Customer Service Department by e-mail at service@fdli.org.

Subscription Pricing
$299 Member | $379 Non-Member