Global Medicine Does Not Make for Global Courts

August 2005

60 Food and Drug Law Journal 453-458 (2005).

In June 2005, the California Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District, comprising the county of Santa Clara in the Silicon Valley, held that a trial court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant pharmaceutical company based "solely on the global exchange and management of medical and scientific information relative to drug safety and regulatory compliance." As a result of this holding, the foreign pharmaceutical companies in this case were dismissed as defendants from this action and could not be held liable to the plaintiffs, in the event of any verdict or settlement. This article discusses this decision's crucial and significant implications for international pharmaceutical companies with affiliates or related entities in California, and potentially other states that have yet to embrace this standard.


FDLI's policy regarding the Food and Drug Law Journal online is: Only the Table of Contents and article abstracts for each issue will be posted to our website. Those visitors wishing to obtain a full text version of a particular article, or a copy of an entire issue, may contact FDLI’s Customer Service Department by e-mail at service@fdli.org. Your purchase will be processed quickly, and at reasonable rates.

Any questions or concerns regarding this policy should be directed to Michael Levin-Epstein,
FDLI's Editor-in-Chief.